- Multiple-Element Arrangements
Construction contracts frequently involve a combination of activities including design, procurement, construction, installation, project management and maintenance.
Under the revisions, businesses need to establish whether these activities should be accounted for individually or as part of a single performance obligation. For example, a contractor may be responsible for the design and construction of a facility which includes design, procurement and construction. The assessment of revenue would need to consider the specific terms and commercial substance of the contract to identify whether these activities, are integrated to deliver one combined outcome, or whether they are separate obligations.
Revenue recognition is likely to require greater analysis at the outset of a project, with documented conclusions.
- Multiple contracts with the same customer:
Construction projects may involve several agreements between the same customer and contractor. These may relate to different stages of a development, additional works or separate elements of a wider project.
Under the revised requirements, multiple contracts may need to be considered together where they are closely linked which may affect the measurement and timing of revenue.
This could apply where contracts:
- are negotiated as a package with one overall commercial objective;
- contain pricing or performance terms that are dependent on another contract; or
- include goods or services that together represent a single performance obligation.
Construction businesses should therefore consider the accounting consequences when negotiating related contracts, particularly where projects are divided into separate legal agreements for commercial or operational reasons.
- Stage of completion:
Construction entities commonly recognise revenue based on the stage of completion at the reporting date. Recognising revenue as construction work progresses may still be appropriate under the revised requirements; however, businesses must first establish that the conditions for recognising revenue over time have been met. The conditions are:
- the customer receives and consumes the benefits of the work as it is performed;
- the entity’s performance creates or enhances an asset that the customer controls as it is created or enhanced; or
- the asset being created has no alternative use to the entity and the entity has an enforceable right to payment for work completed to date.
The third condition can be particularly relevant to bespoke construction projects. The contractual right to payment needs to provide appropriate compensation for the work carried out to date.
Where the criteria for recognising revenue over time are not satisfied, revenue will generally be recognised at the point when control of the relevant goods or services transfers to the customer.
Where over-time recognition is appropriate, businesses need to select a method of recognition which can include:
- Output methods, such as surveys of work completed, milestones achieved or units delivered.
- Input methods, such as costs incurred or labour hours.
For example, on a £10m construction contract with a 20% margin, a QS valuation establishes that 40% of the contracted work has been completed at the reporting date. Only £2m of costs have been incurred.
Currently, the contractor would recognise £4m of revenue and provide for £3.2m of costs. Under the revised standard the contractor would recognise £4m of revenue and only £2m of costs, resulting in significantly different profits.
Reliable project reporting is particularly important here. Finance teams will need access to accurate information about costs incurred, work completed and expected project outcomes.
- Variable Consideration
Construction contracts can contain a range of variable amounts such as bonuses, incentives, penalties, liquidated damages, discounts, claims and variations.
Under revised Section 23, businesses need to estimate variable consideration using an appropriate method. Depending on the circumstances, this may involve:
- the expected value, which takes account of the probability of different possible outcomes; or
- the most likely amount, where there are a limited number of possible outcomes.
Businesses cannot automatically recognise the full estimated amount. Variable consideration is subject to constraints and should only be included where it is highly probable that doing so that the revenue will be received.
This places greater importance on the quality of project forecasting and the evidence supporting estimates. Construction businesses require strong processes for monitoring variations with finance and commercial teams working closely together.
- Contract modifications and variations
Changes to construction contracts are a normal part of many projects. Additional works, design changes, specification amendments and unforeseen circumstances can all result in the original agreement being modified.
Depending on the circumstances, a modification may be treated as:
- a separate contract;
- a termination of the existing contract and creation of a new contract; or
- a modification of the existing contract, potentially resulting in a cumulative catch-up adjustment.
The appropriate treatment depends on factors including whether the additional goods or services are distinct and how the revised pricing relates to the additional work. Significant variations should therefore be assessed when they occur rather than waiting until the reporting date.
- Warranties:
Warranties are common in construction contracts, but they do not all receive the same accounting treatment.
The key consideration is whether the warranty simply provides assurance that the completed work meets the agreed specification, or whether it provides the customer with an additional service.
Broadly:
- Service-type warranties, such as warranties providing an additional service or sold separately, may represent a separate performance obligation.
- Assurance-type warranties, which primarily protect the customer against defects or non-compliance with the agreed specification, are generally dealt with as provisions for the expected rectification costs.
The distinction can affect both revenue recognition and the timing of associated costs.
Construction businesses should review the terms and substance of their warranty arrangements rather than assuming that every warranty should be treated in the same way.
- Contract-related costs
The revised requirements also introduce specific considerations for costs incurred in obtaining and fulfilling contracts.
Certain incremental costs of obtaining a contract, such as qualifying sales commissions, may be recognised as an asset where they would not have been incurred if the contract had not been obtained; and the business expects to recover them.
There is also a practical approach available for certain qualifying costs where the period over which they would otherwise be amortised is one year or less. These costs can generally be recognised as an expense when incurred.
For businesses with significant contract-related expenditure, this may require changes to existing accounting policies and internal processes.
Construction businesses should consider whether their current systems capture sufficient information to identify qualifying costs and distinguish them from expenditure that should be recognised immediately.
- Loss-making contracts
These continue to be considered under Section 21, Provisions and Contingencies. Where the unavoidable costs of fulfilling a contract exceed the economic benefits expected to arise from it, a provision may be required.